Comment Search Tool

RE: "I have to say the Adding Locations requirement is a little ridiculous because it will be very hard to find locations that no one else has" -- definitely not true, and that sentiment has usually been a sign in the past of users not really invested in the hobby. There are abandoned locations everywhere and new ones pop up constantly in every locality. This is going to sound like a sarcastic comment, but it isn't in any way. Another easy suggestion is to consider known historic spots in your area. Chances are many of those are not listed in the database because people have just never thought to put them in. But there's certainly nothing wrong with photographing and sticking them in the database at Level 1 for others to enjoy.

though the minimum requirements are not 100% strict requirements, but they are very strong criteria. you could have 2 locations but 20 albums, i would vote yes for that

there are many locations that haven't been uploaded, and many properties are actively becoming urbex. i like to keep an eye out for bandos whenever i'm in a bus or car and i find a decent bit. though the most efficient way i would say is scouting google maps satellite view for clues

I have to say the Adding Locations requirement is a little ridiculous because it will be very hard to find locations that no one else has

I meant to downvote, oops

declined because it appears to be a mistake from the user

you dont

no how do i delete this

keep it up dude

Niche, quality content. I love seeing history from little places on the other side of Canada from me. Meets requirements too

Can we please have more feedback about this promotion.

shit now i wanna take back my vote

Edit: I now have 20 locations and 52 albums as of typing this.

Wait, never mind she has 3 locations. I'm blind. However it hasn't even been 3 months lol

didn't even realize she hasn't been on the site for more than 3 months i take back my thumbs up